Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- about_the_name [2017/06/28 20:41] – tatz
+++ about_the_name [2017/07/31 23:14] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
-So how exactly did we end up with the name **Schloss Schönburn**?
+Why **Schloss Schönburn**?
-As some of you have noticed, we asked the community to help us to find the name and there were two poll rounds.
+Well as some of you have noticed, we asked the community to help us to find the name and there were two poll rounds.
 First one with some of our ideas and the possibility to suggest own ideas. (18.05.17 - 21.05.17)
 In the second one people could vote for the 2 top voted names and 8 curated suggestions from the previous poll. (23.05.17 - 28.05.17)
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 . We haven’t defined for us how exactly we will deal with the poll results. We haven’t thought all the cases through e.g. what would have happened with a tie? After the surveys were over, everyone had a different opinion on what we should do with the results. We would have saved us a lot of time and energy by setting some rules before publishing the polls.
-. Sjkg
+. We were too naive about the amount of people getting involved in a new burn project. Our post about the burn and the naming procedure reached on facebook 4.806 burners. In the end less than 60 people participated in the survey.
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 After taking a look at the final poll results, you probably noticed two aspects:
-. The vote difference between the names is 4 or less what is not a very satisfying or clear result.
+. The vote difference between the top 5 names is 4 or less, what is not a very satisfying or clear result.
-. The results are based on 60 votes in total. The platform we used for the survey prevented the same ip address from voting more than once. Since we are aware from at least one person, who voted twice by accident (using different devices), we can conclude that less than 60 people participated in the survey. Are these enough votes to represent a project which will involve 5 times more people in the first year and many many more in the future?
+. The results are based on 60 votes in total. The platform we used for the survey prevented the same ip address from voting more than once. Since we are aware of at least one person, who voted twice by accident (using different devices), we can conclude that less than 60 people participated in the survey. Are these enough votes to represent a project which will involve 5 times more people in the first year and many many more in the future?
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 . We agreed that to ignore the poll results completely would be unacceptable.
-. We agreed that the name should represent at least a little bit the Austrian touch of it.
+. We agreed that the name should have at least a little bit of an Austrian touch.
 . We agreed that the name shouldn't be liked, but at least accepted by the majority of the core team.
-With this in mind we went through the names from the top and have chosen the 3rd winner. In our opinion **Schloss Schönburn** or just **Schönburn** is a nice wordplay that on the one hand reminds you of one of the most beautiful castles in Austria [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6nbrunn_Palace|Schönbrunn Palace]] and on the other hand it consists of the words **schön** (German for beautiful, lovely) and **burn**. And that's all we want. A beautiful lovely burn in a castle created by all of us together.
+With this in mind we went through the names from the top and have chosen the 3rd winner. In our opinion **Schloss Schönburn** or just **Schönburn** is a nice wordplay that on the one hand reminds you of one of the most beautiful castles in Austria [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6nbrunn_Palace|Schönbrunn Palace]] and on the other hand it combines the words **schön** (German for beautiful, lovely) and **burn**. And that's all we want. A beautiful lovely burn in a castle created by all of us together.